Hello everyone!
Late last week I was invited to attend a policy dialogue in Cambodia, organized by Stimson (a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank which aims to enhance international peace and security through a combination of analysis and outreach....from wikipedia) with funding from the US State Department ka.
The focus was on Human Resources and Capacity and my talk (my title was MK-US Heart-ership) was to share my experiences and views working with CLMV ka. My emphasis was on the sincerity, trust, and commitment in partnership while focusing on shared future/goals and one same big picture, quality of the projects, and full cycle of implementation (not only on numbers but results/impacts ka).
Here is what I learned ka:
- Many investments have been in this Mekong subregion (this dialogue excludes China who is a member country of Mekong and also a big intra donor for this subregion) and some could be overlapped as it seems that there's no central coordinator to manage the big picture. If done well, we'd see more effective and more powerful impacts na ka.
- Types and numbers of projects in addition to funding invested seemed to get attention over links, integration among projects and impacts out of the individual/collective efforts and goals.
- I liked a few speakers and let me share only two so this message won't be too long ka. One was Dam Bich Thuy, President of Fulbright University Vietnam who pointed out 3 things universities had to do, namely, be innovative, holding on to their values and identities (stay true to our identify, learners to know themselves and she put it as 'to be' referring to both success and productive life), and be future-focused.
Another is a Thai CEO, Khun Panyanuch Pattanothai, CEO of Generation Thailand, who shared how the organization helps link underserved youth with employment by bridging their employability skill gaps...... tough jobs from recruitment, training and design to assessment, mentoring and improvement, all are data-driven. The Mckinsey model sees the full cycle of processes needed and I like this holistic approach very much ka. I told her I'd like to shadow her for a week ka! Don't know when but the work she's been doing is really contributive.
Several other elements I liked as well were:
- When I was asked to participate, the host asked all the panelists to come up with one question for attendees to answer. This was the very first time I got such a request and found it very useful for me and the attendees if I could come up with one good question ka. However, I was unsure how they used them as I didn't see the questions or I might have missed them!?!
This can be one good practice for us ka.
- One provost who served as moderator brought his students who are really bright research fellows. One was bold, not just to express his ideas and suggestions, but also his doubts about the present implementation of his government and others around. He felt upset that the Cambodian government doesn't care much at all about research too.
How I wish we could encourage our younger researchers to attend actively.
It was really great to see passionate people working for the better of Mekong countries.....still wish more could touch on the humanistic side as most projects seemed to respond to employment, competitiveness, greening of the world....not that the issues aren't important, but I feel hollow in my heart as we do need attention and some more focus as an integral part of projects/partnership to nurture caring, healthy mind and soul.
Any issue igniting your thought mai ka? share with me loei ka.