I just skimmed through several articles
relating to IZN from University World News of June 1, 2018.
A few points I've jotted down to share with
you are:
1. From an article Internationalization- New
voices, ideas, and approaches by Douglas Proctor and Laura E Rumbley, it
shows that explosion to study on IZN is on policy
and practice. Many research studies on IZN are available
yet, recent analysis of global trends in research ‘highlights a concentration
of focus on a small number of (principally Anglophone) countries and a narrow
range of key topics (predominantly related to the international mobility of
students).’
I’m glad that strategic decision-makers
have increasingly geared their attention to IZN along with allocation of
resources. The authors point out that diverse perspectives – grounded in
critical, high-quality
scholarship – are essential.
To understand the future of IZN in higher education,
the authors propose that a spotlight be on the ‘perspectives of a ‘next
generation’ of IZN specialists from around the world and prompt them to
propose what they consider to be the crucial new contexts shaping IZN of higher education, new
modes for exploring and understanding distinct aspects
of the phenomenon and new topics relevant to its
development and implementation.’
2. Another is ‘HE leaders need more training in
internationalisation’ by Han de Wit. He says globally,
it’s obvious about an increase in the number of ‘senior international officers’ – or SIOs, ‘putting
international education front and center before senior management – rectors,
presidents, vice-rectors and vice-presidents.’
Now, more is discussing quality in higher education and the need to ensure the quality of the professional preparation of those in charge of institutions’. This will enable more senior-level professionals to have a broader knowledge of international education.
Now, more is discussing quality in higher education and the need to ensure the quality of the professional preparation of those in charge of institutions’. This will enable more senior-level professionals to have a broader knowledge of international education.
The following are some of the statements senior
leaders need to know ka:
·
IZN has impacted all domains of higher
education policy – research, teaching and learning – and is part of
universities’ mission to serve society.
·
IZN is no longer the exclusive domain of SIOs
and their offices, but is increasingly part of the responsibilities of
senior management.
·
For senior management, IZN has become more
than overseeing the SIO and his or her office and signing memoranda of
understanding.
·
For senior management, IZN is a key agenda
issue at the sectoral and systemic levels, nationally, regionally and globally.
For our IZN efforts in Thailand, it
seems we could claim our progress in some areas like the position of VP for
international affairs and projects on exchanges, collaborative research, and
joint/double degree programs. However, there needs to be more strategic
with increased genuine attention and understanding of senior administration
from national to university levels so as not to be seen as
event/activity-based that seem to be far too ceremonial than serious
cooperation with results that can impact our own students and institutions. We
also need research studies relating to IZN in our areas of focus ka.
One little joy is that what SEAMEO RIHED
has initiated a project, ‘Support for Capacity Building of the Greater Mekong
Sub-region University Consortium (GMS-UC) (Phase 1).’ with collaboration of
the ASEAN Secretariat under the framework of the Japan-ASEAN Integration Fund
(JAIF). It includes leadership training for presidents/rectors and VPs to
ensure understanding and alignment of strategic actions. Hope it’s a success
ka.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น